Farm Fires: Punjab AG did not seek immediate removal of paddy's MSP in previous hearing, says Supreme Court
Stresses their intent to support strategies to tackle farm fires than immediate abolition of paddy MSP
Farm fires issue: The Supreme Court clarified in its ruling that during the previous hearing, Punjab's Advocate General Gurminder Singh did not propose the immediate removal of MSP (Minimum Support Price) for paddy.
The Supreme Court emphasised that this action should be viewed as a long-term measure and urged a focus on crop diversification. It suggested exploring alternatives and different varieties of paddy and promoting crops that alleviate the stubble burning issue.
The Supreme Court, while deliberating on the critical issue of farm fires and agricultural reforms, urged all stakeholders to expeditiously execute measures to check the menace.
Addressing the pressing concern of farm fires, the Supreme Court emphasised the necessity for a comprehensive approach, asserting that all efforts, akin to a "carrot and stick" policy, must be mobilised to effectively curb these incidents. Acknowledging the higher percentage of farm fires in Punjab, the apex court clarified that other states also bear responsibility, underscoring the collective obligation to address this nationwide issue.
During the hearing, various constructive suggestions emerged, notably emphasising the utilisation of advanced technology to promptly detect and control farm fires by pinpointing their exact locations. However, the court underscored that the execution of these strategies falls within the administrative realm, emphasising the judiciary's role in ensuring effective implementation by the relevant authorities.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court reiterated the imperative for long-term agricultural reforms, stressing phased crop diversification. This approach includes advocating alternative varieties of paddy and encouraging cultivation practices that eliminate the need for stubble removal, thereby mitigating future fire risks.
Clarifications were issued regarding earlier submissions by Punjab Advocate General Gurminder Singh, emphasising their intent to support the aforementioned strategies rather than an immediate abolition of the Minimum Support Price (MSP) for paddy.
Highlighting discussions on crop diversification, as adopted by Haryana, the court reiterated the need for sustained efforts towards fostering sustainable agricultural practices.
As a significant step towards compliance with the court's directives, the Chairman of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) was excused from further court presence, signifying the initial steps taken to adhere to the court's orders.
The Supreme Court adjourned the matter to reconvene on November 21,underlining the continued focus on addressing these critical agricultural issues for a sustainable and resilient future.